Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  152 / 162 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 152 / 162 Next Page
Page Background

human tissue, with careful and measured interpretation, remain of utmost

importance to informing relevant TBI research.

Keywords: Study Design, Translation

WLW1-03

THE GLASGOW TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ARCHIVE

Jennifer Hay

1,2

, William Stewart

1,2

1

Glasgow University, Neuropathology, Glasgow, UK

2

Southern General Hospital, Neuropathology, Glasgow, UK

As an outcome of the international, inter-disciplinary meeting on the

‘‘Late Effects of Head Injury’’ held in Washington in 1969 there was a

call for the establishment of brain banks specifically dedicated to studies

in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Almost a half century later, the Glasgow

TBI Archive represents the only comprehensive archive of human brain

tissue dedicated to studies in TBI internationally. Comprising materials

from TBI patients across a spectrum of ages, the Glasgow TBI Archive

represents a comprehensive and unique archive of biospecimens con-

taining: in excess of 2000 cases of traumatic brain injury as paraffin wax

blocks sampled from immersion fixed whole brain specimens; ap-

proximately 50 TBI cases as snap-frozen, fresh tissue samples; exten-

sive, non-TBI control tissue samples as paraffin tissue blocks and snap

frozen tissue; in excess of 1200 DNA samples from patients in ongoing

longitudinal clinical studies in TBI. Each case has been meticulously

gathered using standardised sampling protocols, with all specimens

linked to demographic data, clinical information including details on

injury and cause of death, post mortem interval and neuropathology

findings. Under the governance arrangements of the Greater Glasgow

and Clyde Health Board Bio-repository, the Glasgow TBI Archive has

broad and enduring ethical approval for use in research studies via a

streamlined online application to the GGC Bio-repository Steering

Committee. The influence of this archive can be traced through the

literature on the neuropathology of human TBI, with over 150 peer-

reviewed publications derived from observation on material from this

resource, including landmark and continued observations on axonal

injury and neurodegeneration after TBI. The requirement for robust and

informative TBI research utilising human tissue samples is as relevant

now as it was in 1969. Further, there exists a pressing need to expand

current archive holdings and to establish new tissue holdings to support

relevant studies in the wider TBI research community.

Keywords: neuropathology, TBI archive

WNR1 WINTR Reception

WNR1

CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN NEUROTRAUMA RESEARCH

Mary Ellen Michel

NIH, NCMRR, NICHD, Rockville, USA

Early career choices involve funding decisions, from pre- and post-

doctoral applications at academic institutions to deciding to pursue

research in the private sector, or even leave the bench or bedside to

have careers in administration, law, writing or other disciplines. For

those who choose academics (and the private sector) grant writing will

be a big part of their endeavors. The biggest funder of biomedical

research in the US is the federal government starting with NIH, fol-

lowed by DoD, NSF, CDC, SAMHSA. Private foundations have al-

ways supported investigators and projects, usually targeted toward

specific diseases. Navigating the funding spectrum might not be a full

time job, but it is definitely a significant part of anyone’s career and

successful funding is critical for individuals, academic institutions and

small business ventures. NIH offers various workshops, seminars,

discussions, websites that can help you, but networking is critical to

your success. If you are an associate, post-doc, or assistant professor,

ally yourself with someone who has a grant. Get to know what they do

to be successful: if it involves secret handshakes or lucky charms,

don’t knock it. Have them introduce you to their program officers at

NIH/NSF. Go to national meetings and participate in interest groups.

Publish as much as you can—find the ‘‘least publishable unit’’ for

your field. If you have the opportunity, be an

ad hoc

reviewer for a

funding agency. AND be good mentors to the people who will in-

evitably start to look to you for advice.

Keywords: NIH, career development

A-152