Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 162 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 162 Next Page
Page Background

after sTBI. Subjects 18–75 yrs with sTBI were assessed for genetic

relationships with PTS. Genetic variants within neuronal glutamate

transporters, SCL1A1 and SCL1A6, were screened for 253 individ-

uals. Kaplan-Meier curves, compared with log-rank statistics, were

used to estimate seizure rates from admission to 3 yrs and 2 days post-

injury through 3 yrs post-injury for SNPs by genotype. Cox propor-

tional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for SNPs

significant in Kaplan-Meier, adjusting for known risk factors. 32 SNPs

were examined (SLC1A1: n

=

28, SLC1A6: n

=

4). 49 (19.37%) sub-

jects had PTS. Of these, 18 (36.73%) subjects seized within 7 days,

and 31 (63.27%) seized 8 days-3 yrs post-TBI. Correcting for multiple

comparisons, rs10974620 (SLC1A1) was significantly associated with

time to first seizure across the 3 yr follow-up (seizure rates: 77.1%

minor allele homozygous, 24.8% heterozygous, 16.6% major allele

homozygous; p

=

0.001). When beginning PTS follow-up on day 2,

rs7858819 (SLC1A1) was significantly associated with PTS risk

(seizure rates: 52.7% minor allele homozygous, 11.8% heterozygous,

21.1% major allele homozygous; p

=

0.002). After adjusting for cov-

ariates, rs10974620 but not rs7858819, remained significant

(rs10974620: p

=

0.018; HR: 5.24, 95%CI: 1.67–16.48, minor allele

versus major allele homozygous). Genetic variation within SCL1A1,

specifically rs1094620 and rs7858819, is associated with epilepto-

genesis following sTBI, as demonstrated by time-to-event analyses.

Future studies are needed to confirm findings, but variation within

neuronal glutamate transporter genes may represent a possible ther-

apeutic target for pharmacological PTS prevention.

Keywords: rehabilomics, epileptogenesis, genetic variation, neu-

ronal transmitters, glutamate, TBI

B4-03

COMPARISONOF FACTORS PREDICTINGPOST-TRAUMATIC

SEIZURE AT 1, 2, & 5 YEARS POST-INJURY: A TBIMS

ANALYSIS

Anne Ritter

1,2

, Amy Wagner

1,3,4

, TBI-MS PTS Writing Group

2

1

Univ Pittsburgh, Epidemiology, Pittsburgh, USA

2

Univ Pittsburgh, Physical Medicine/Rehab, Pittsburgh, USA

3

Univ Pittsburgh, Safar Center, Pittsburgh, USA

4

Univ Pittsburgh, Neuroscience, Pittsburgh, USA

Post-traumatic seizures (PTS) occur frequently following traumatic

brain injury (TBI). Published PTS prevalence rates depend on study

characteristics, and there is limited information regarding long-term

differences in PTS risk factors over recovery. Therefore, we devel-

oped logistic regression models, describing the most important fac-

tors related to PTS at 1, 2, & 5 years post-TBI. Data were collected

from the TBI Model Systems National Database, a multi-center

longitudinal study examining long-term recovery and outcomes after

TBI. PTS prevalence at each time-point was calculated. Baseline

history and injury characteristics were selected

a priori

from risk

factors identified in previous studies and biological plausibility.

Subjects with missing data were excluded at individual time-points.

For each model: Univariate logistic regression for each variable of

interest was performed; effect size and significance were calculated.

Variables were ranked by level of significance, and those with

p

>

0.20 excluded. A main effects model was then fit. Forward and

backward regression were then performed, and variables excluded if

p

>

0.10 in forward, and if p

>

0.05 in backward regression. All

models controlled for injury year. Fit was assessed using Hosmer-

Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test. At years 1, 2, & 5: 4,236, 2,991,

and 1,176 subjects had complete data. At each follow-up, acute

hospitalization seizure (all p

<

0.0001; OR: 3.37, 3.28, 5.13) and

craniectomy (all p

<

0.0001; OR: 2.86; 2.19; 2.51) were the most

significant predictors. All models include craniotomy, penetrating

TBI, and subdural hematoma. Additional significant variables in-

clude: (year-1) post-traumatic amnesia duration and pre-injury in-

carceration, (year-2) contusion load, race, and pre-injury cognitive

limitation, (year-5) contusion load and race. Some PTS risk variables

are dynamic, while the most significant remain consistent across the

follow-up period. Some variables (e.g. incarceration) may be proxies

for latent risk factors; others (e.g. acute-care seizure, craniectomy)

could inform risk associated with clinical practice, justify prophy-

lactic therapies development research, and support experimental

PTS model development.

Keywords: Rehabilomics, TBI, population risk factors, prediction

modeling, PTS

B4-04

EFFECTS OF LEVETIRACETAM AND GABAPENTIN COM-

BINATION THERAPY ON POST-TRAUMATIC NON-

CONVULSIVE SEIZURES (NCS) INDUCED BY A

PENETRATIN

Xi-Chun May Lu

1

, Ronald Tallarida

2

, Ying Cao

1

, Zhinlin Liao

1

,

Deborah Shear

1

, Frank Tortella

1

1

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Brain Trauma Neuropro-

tection & Neurorestoration/Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Silver

Spring, USA

2

Temple University, Dept. Pharmacology, Philadelphia, USA

When tested as monotherapies, levetiracetam (LEV) and gabapentin

(GBP) showed different anti-seizure dose-response profiles against

nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) induced by penetrating ballistic-like

brain injury (PBBI) in rats. LEV (12.5–100 mg/kg) reduced NCS

frequency and duration in a dose-dependent fashion whereas the

anti-seizure effects of GBP appeared to plateau across the dose-

range tested (12.5–25 mg/kg). The current study tested a series of

fixed-dose ratios of the LEV

+

GBP combination to determine if

combining these two drugs would produce additive or synergistic

effects. All rats received frontal PBBI, immediately followed by

continuous EEG monitoring for 72 h. LEV

+

GBP treatment (LEV/

GBP: 6.3/0.62, 12.6/1.25, 25/2.5, 50.7/5.0, 101.4/10.0 mg/kg) was

administered intravenously twice/day for three days, initiated 30 min

post-injury. Control animals received matching vehicle treatments.

Compared to vehicle-treated group, LEV

+

GPB combination ther-

apy reduced PBBI-induced NCS incidence from 69% (vehicle

group) to 27–65% and delayed NCS onset latency from 12.3h (ve-

hicle group) to 19.1–57.8h across all LEV

+

GBP treated groups.

Among the five dose ratios tested, the most significant anti-seizure

effects were afforded by the three highest dose ratios (25/2.5, 50.7/

5.0, and 101.4/10.0 mg/kg) as evidenced by the dose-dependent re-

duction in NCS frequency (34%, 45%, and 64%), and shortened

NCS duration (44%, 59% and 58%), respectively (p

<

0.05 vs. ve-

hicle treatment for each measure). However, the dose equivalence

analysis indicated that the observed anti-seizure effects of the

LEV

+

GBP combination failed to achieve additivity or synergism.

Consequently, these findings showed that a LEV

+

GBP combination

therapy replicated the dose-response profile of LEV monotherapy,

but did not benefit from the addition of GBP to improve their anti-

seizure activities. Hence, any advantage in simultaneous usage of

these two drugs appears limited.

This research was funded by the Army Combat Casualty Care

Research Program.

Keywords: Combination Therapy, Penetrating brain Injury, Leve-

tiracetam, Gabapentin, Isobolographic analysis

A-56