Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  103 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

B6-24

SHARED NEUROIMAGING DATA OF MILITARY AND

BLAST TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY USING A DATA

SHARING REPOSITORY

Justin Senseney

, Rich Hammett, Terrence Oakes, Gerard Riedy

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Intrepid

Center of Excellence, Bethesda, USA

Objective:

We are sharing neuroimaging data (N

=

300) through the

Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Repository (FITBIR) so

that academic researchers have access to our unique military popu-

lation for secondary and meta-analysis.

Methods:

Subjects receive two 45-minute scans on a GE Signa 750

3T MRI scanner with a 32-channel phased array head coil. This in-

cludes conventional structural volumetric brain imaging of T1, T2,

flair, and post-contrast imaging. Subjects also receive perfusion, MR

spectroscopy, susceptibility-weighted, diffusion tensor, and both

resting and task-based functional imaging. Subjects also elect to un-

dergo a brain CT scan and PET scan using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose.

In addition to demographic and prior injury information, the SF-36

Health Survey, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Combat

Exposure Scale (CES), and PTSD Checklist (PCL-C) are shared. We

use a custom tool shared with FITBIR to submit these data. These data

provide military-specific information that we hope spurs increased

research on TBI in the military, and provide many of the same

measures that are collected in civilian studies.

Results:

We chose subsets of our neuroimaging subjects to share at

an accelerated schedule (N

=

300) to spur academic research in mili-

tary TBI. These are curated into subsets ideal for resting-state and

other modalities. These data are the first in FITBIR with CES, PET,

spectroscopy, and annotated task-based fMRI data; we are working

with FITBIR to develop methods to query these data. These data will

be the first large military TBI dataset in FITBIR.

Conclusion:

Researchers throughout the TBI community now have

access to a large and diverse military clinical TBI population for

secondary and meta-analysis. We anticipate that this will spur in-

creased study of military and blast TBI at civilian research centers,

and augment smaller research studies. While data currently being

submitted to FITBIR have a long schedule for data sharing, we are

making these datasets widely available within FITBIR for increased

research in military TBI.

Keywords: database, FITBIR, neuroimaging, military, blast

B6-25

CONNECTOME-SCALE ASSESSMENT OF BRAIN NETWORK

CONNECTIVITY IN MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Zhifeng Kou

1

, Armin Iraji

1

, Hanbo Chen

2

, Natalie Wiseman

1

, E Mark

Haacke

1

, Robert Welch

1

, Tianming Liiu

2

1

Wayne State University, Biomedical Engineering and Radiology,

Detroit, USA

2

University of Georgia, Computer Science, Athens, GA

Most mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients have normal

findings in clinical neuroimaging despite their constellation of

clinical and neurocognitive symptoms after injury that significantly

impact their quality of life. Mounting evidence suggests alterations

in brain functional connectivity (FC). Identifying FC alterations on a

large scale or connectome-scale can provide us a better under-

standing of the network substrates of brain injury, which can po-

tentially assist physicians to select appropriate treatments. In this

longitudinal study, FC of the brain has been evaluated on a large

scale. Diffusion tensor and resting state functional magnetic reso-

nance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired for 24 healthy subjects at

two time points with a 6-weeks interval and 16 mTBI patients at

acute and sub-acute stages at Detroit Receiving Hospital. A novel

prediction framework was utilized to identify 358 network nodes,

known as dense individualized common connectivity based cortical

landmarks (DICCCOLs), distributed all across the whole brain. The

location of each DICCCOL was identified based on the white matter

fiber connection profile optimized from fiber tractography. Each

DICCCOL preserves structural and functional properties across in-

dividuals with maximum group consistency. The longitudinal sta-

tistical analysis was performed using a mixed design analysis of

variance (ANOVA) and Network-Based Statistic (NBS) to identify

disrupted FCs, known as connectomic signatures. The group effect

identified 258 FCs significantly affected in mTBI patients. All

connectomic signatures showed increased FC in the patient group.

These 258 connectomic signatures were further categorized using

meta-analysis and a data-driven approach, called multiview spectral

cluster analysis. Meta-analysis reveals that the interaction between

‘‘Action’’ and ‘‘Cognition’’ functional domains, specifically the in-

teraction between ‘‘Execution’’ (from ‘‘Action’’) and ‘‘Attention’’

(from ‘‘Cognition’’) are affected the most. Categorizing con-

nectomic signatures using a clustering approach identified that the

general pattern of FC changes could be related to a Posterior-

Anterior compensatory mechanism of the brain.

Keywords: Connectome, Functional connectivity, Large-scale brain

networks, mild traumatic brain injury

B6-26

VALIDATION OF DUAL-INJECTION PERFUSION IMA-

GING: A PILOT STUDY

Natalie Wiseman

1

, Mahmoud Zeydabadinezhad

2

, Meng Li

3

, Jessy

Mouannes-Srour

3

, Yongquan Ye

3

, E. Mark Haacke

2,3

, Zhifeng Kou

1–3

1

Wayne State University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral

Neurosciences, Detroit, USA

2

Wayne State University, Department of Biomedical Engineering,

Detroit, USA

3

Wayne State University, Department of Radiology, Detroit, USA

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) could render deficits in cerebral blood

flow and metabolism, measurable by advanced imaging techniques.

Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging (DSC-

PWI) suffers from blooming, clipping, and saturation effects in large

vessels, which make of arterial input function (AIF) determination

unreliable. To combat this, we have used a dual-injection method, in

which 1/6 of the contrast dose is used to determine the AIF and the

remaining 5/6 is used to visualize the perfusion in brain tissue. We

compared cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements to those from

pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL), an MR method

with good reliability, validated against positron emission tomography

(PET). Two subjects underwent imaging with pCASL and DSC-PWI.

DSC-PWI was performed twice (with 1/6 dose, then with 5/6). AIF

was generated from the low-dose PWI scan, scaled up, and applied to

the high dose data. The pcASL CBF maps were coregistered to these

and regions of interest (ROIs) drawn, each in a single tissue type. The

correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.63 show good correlation in

large ROIs and slightly poorer correlation in the small ROIs, re-

spectively. PWI analysis performed with only the high dose data and

no AIF prediction showed a worse R

2

of 0.76 in the large ROIs. The

improvement of R

2

between DSC-PWI and pCASL with the low-dose

A-67