Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  171 / 198 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 171 / 198 Next Page
Page Background

maximum speed of coordinated walking and decrease in rear stance

and stride length indicating enhanced balance, coordination and

plantar placement in animals treated with salubrinal. This improved

functional recovery in CHOP

-/-

- and salubrinal-treated mice correlated

with an increase in white matter sparing, MBP, claudin 11, Olig2

mRNA levels and decreased oligodendrocyte apoptosis. In contrast,

genetic ablation of GADD34 (a stress-inducible signaling effector

downstream of CHOP that dephosphorylates eIF2

a

) or its pharma-

cological targeting using guanabenz protected mOPCs against ER

stress-mediated cytotoxicity and resulted in differential ERSR atten-

uation after SCI, but there was no improvement in hindlimb locomotor

function. Deletion of ATF6 arm of the ERSR failed to improve lo-

comotion after SCI. Thus, the ERSR contributes to oligodendrocyte

loss and implicates the critical role of homeostatic arm of the ERSR

after SCI. We contend that pharmacological targeting of the ERSR

after CNS trauma is therapeutically viable.

Keywords: ER stress, oligodendrocytes, spinal cord injury, white

matter sparing

PL07 Facilitating Transparency in Data Analysis for

TBI and SCI Research

PL07-01

INTRODUCTION ABOUT BIG AND SMALL DATA IN TBI

AND SCI

Denes Agoston

Uniformed Services University, APG, Bethesda, USA

Vast amount and highly heterogeneous data describing various aspects

of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) have

been generated over the last several decades and growing every day.

However the next step, generating knowledge from existing data has

been hindered by different issues including various heterogeneities,

such as differences in outcome measures, data formats, etc. In addi-

tion, we currently do not have the ability to analyze and interpret our

new data in the context of existing data. The current gap between

clinical and experimental outcome measures, time points, etc. also

needs to be addressed. The proposed session is aimed to discuss some

of these critical issues.

Keywords: data transparency

PL07-02

TOWARDS A ROADMAP FOR TRANSLATION OF CANDI-

DATE TREATMENTS FOR SPINAL CORD INJURY

Wolfram Tetzlaff

University of British Columbia, ICORD, International Collaboration

on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, Canada

A roadmap for the translation of candidate treatments for spinal cord

injury does not exist, effective treatments for human SCI are still

lacking, and clinical trials have been initiated with variable amounts

of preclinical supporting data. Over the past years we attempted to

garner the opinions of researchers, clinicians and consumers regarding

the necessary/desirable preclinical data required to justify the execu-

tion of a clinical trial – including our most recent opinion polling and

discussion on the need of large animals and primate data. Excerpts of

these discussions will be presented.

Keywords: translational roadmap, opinion polling, preclinical evidence

PL07-03

PRECLINICAL TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY COMMON

DATA ELEMENTS: TOWARDS A COMMON LANGUAGE

ACROSS LABORATORIES

Douglas H. Smith

1

, Ramona R. Hicks

2,3

, Victoria E. Johnson

1

, Diana

M. Cummings

2

, Debra A. Bergstrom

2

, Linda J. Noble

4

, David Hovda

5

,

Michael Whalen

6

, Stephen T. Ahlers

7

, Michelle LaPlaca

8

, Frank C.

Tortella

9

, Ann-Christine Duhaime

10

, C. Edward Dixon

11

1

Univ. of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Philadelphia, USA

2

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological

Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA

3

One Mind, Leadership Team, Seattle, USA

4

Univ. of California, San Francisco, Department of Neurological

Surgery, San Francisco, USA

5

Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Neurosurgery, Los Angeles, USA

6

Massachusetts General Hospital, Neuroscience Center, Charlestown,

USA

7

Naval Medical Research Center, Operational & Undersea Medicine,

Silverspring, USA

8

Georgia Tech and Emory University, Biomedical Engineering,

Atlanta, USA

9

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Brain Trauma Neuropro-

tection and Neurorestoration, Silver Spring, USA

10

Harvard Medical School, Department of Neurosurgery, Boston,

USA

11

Univ. of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburg,

USA

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health issue exacting a

substantial personal and economic burden globally. With the advent of

‘‘big data’’ approaches to understanding complex systems, there is the

potential to greatly accelerate knowledge about mechanisms of injury, and

how to detect and modify them to improve patient outcomes. High quality,

well-defined data are critical to the success of bioinformatics platforms and

a data dictionary of ‘‘common data elements’’ (CDEs), as well as ‘‘unique

data elements’’ has been created for clinical TBI research. However, there

is no data dictionary for preclinical TBI research despite similar oppor-

tunities to accelerate knowledge. To address this gap, a committee of

experts was tasked with creating a defined set of data elements to further

collaboration across laboratories and enable the merging of data for meta-

analysis. The CDEs were subdivided into a

Core

module for data elements

relevant to most, if not all, studies, and

Injury-Model-Specific

modules for

non-generalizable data elements. The goals are to provide a common

vehicle to deposit data from the preclinical TBI as CDEs and to facilitate a

common language for comparisons across laboratories.

Keywords: Modeling

PL07-04

FACILITATING REPRODUCIBILITY AND DATA IN-

TEGRATION FOR SCI RESEARCH WITH MIASCI AND RE-

GENBASE

Vance Lemmon

1

, Alison Callahan

2

, Saminda Abeyruwan

3

, Adam

Ferguson

4

, Phillip Popovich

5

, Ubbo Visser

3

, John Bixby

1

1

Univ. of Miami, Miami Project for Cure Paralysis, Miami, USA

2

Stanford Univ., Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Re-

search, Stanford, USA

3

Univ. of Miami, Department of Computer Science, Coral Gables, USA

4

Univ. of Calif., San Francisco, Brain and Spinal Injury Center

(BASIC), Department of Neurological Surgery, San Francisco, USA

5

The Ohio State Univ., Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair and

the Department of Neuroscience, Columbus, USA

A-135